Today's Date: Add To Favorites
Justice Department drops bid to force California to set aside disputed ballots
Court Watch | 2026/11/08 07:20

The U.S. Department of Justice on Friday asked a federal court to dismiss its own lawsuit seeking to stop California from counting about 20,000 ballots that the department claimed were sent to noncitizens, until the voters' immigration status could be confirmed.

The request came days after Republicans suffered heavy losses in the midterm elections and roughly a week before a scheduled hearing at which a court-appointed special master was to review the accuracy of the government's list of alleged noncitizens. California officials have argued that the list is outdated and includes eligible voters, a view the presiding federal judge also expressed in a sharply worded order rejecting the government's request.

Ballots already counted

The lawsuit was filed in mid-October, after ballots had been mailed to all 23 million registered voters in the state and hundreds of thousands had already been processed. Once processed, ballots are fully anonymized.

As of early Friday, state election officials reported about 9 million ballots processed, with nearly 5 million still to be counted. In its motion, the Justice Department said that by the time of the hearing, the challenged ballots would already be irreversibly mixed with valid ones, leaving the relief it sought no longer available and making voluntary dismissal necessary.

U.S. District Judge David O. Carter, an appointee of former President Bill Clinton, named the special master in late October, shortly after allowing California to move forward with its election as planned. In his order, Carter wrote that separating ballots at such a late point could disenfranchise citizens and would cause serious disruption to the midterm elections. The special master was also set to examine whether California election officials actually had a way to separate the ballots.

Department vows to keep pursuing cases

The case had been a centerpiece of the Trump administration's push to exert more control over elections run by the states. President Donald Trump has claimed, without offering evidence, that noncitizen voting is widespread, while available data shows such cases are extremely rare.

Justice Department spokesperson Kiersten Pels repeated the department's earlier claim that California chose to protect illegal voters by refusing to set the ballots aside, and asserted that thousands of likely noncitizens remain on the state's voter rolls and cast ballots in the 2026 elections. In a Friday evening statement, the department said it would continue to pursue suspected election law violations through other cases.

The department also moved to support a separate lawsuit, filed in May, alleging that California violates federal voting laws by failing to adequately remove ineligible voters from its rolls. Bill Essayli, the top federal prosecutor in Los Angeles, said the effort is part of a broader commitment to use every available civil and criminal tool to ensure that only eligible U.S. citizens vote.

The Justice Department is still involved in litigation with several immigrant and voting rights organizations seeking to restrict how it uses its list of suspected noncitizens. Separately, California prosecutors have arrested more than 30 noncitizens in recent weeks on charges of illegally registering to vote, and some are also accused of voting in past elections.



[PREV] [1][2][3][4][5].. [8482] [NEXT]
All
Class Action
Bankruptcy
Biotech
Breaking Legal News
Business
Corporate Governance
Court Watch
Criminal Law
Health Care
Human Rights
Insurance
Intellectual Property
Labor & Employment
Law Center
Law Promo News
Legal Business
Legal Marketing
Litigation
Medical Malpractice
Mergers & Acquisitions
Political and Legal
Politics
Practice Focuses
Securities
Elite Lawyers
Tax
Featured Law Firms
Tort Reform
Venture Business News
World Business News
Law Firm News
Attorneys in the News
Events and Seminars
Environmental
Legal Careers News
Patent Law
Consumer Rights
International
Legal Spotlight
Current Cases
State Class Actions
Federal Class Actions
Justice Department drops bid..
Hong Kong activist Joshua Wo..
Judge orders 30-year prison ..
US bans imports from 3 Chine..
Trump administration asks Su..
2 ex-FBI officials charged w..
Supreme Court agrees to revi..
Court agrees to hear watchdo..
Supreme Court rejects Roy Mo..
Trump says Russia and Ukrain..
Supreme Court rejects Roy Mo..
Bolsonaro and Lula head to a..
Attorney says woman will ple..
Supreme Court lets quick dep..
Maduro ally Alex Saab pleads..


Class action or a representative action is a form of lawsuit in which a large group of people collectively bring a claim to court and/or in which a class of defendants is being sued. This form of collective lawsuit originated in the United States and is still predominantly a U.S. phenomenon, at least the U.S. variant of it. In the United States federal courts, class actions are governed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule. Since 1938, many states have adopted rules similar to the FRCP. However, some states like California have civil procedure systems which deviate significantly from the federal rules; the California Codes provide for four separate types of class actions. As a result, there are two separate treatises devoted solely to the complex topic of California class actions. Some states, such as Virginia, do not provide for any class actions, while others, such as New York, limit the types of claims that may be brought as class actions. They can construct your law firm a brand new website and help you redesign your existing law firm site to secure your place in the internet.
Lorain Elyria Divorce Lawyer
www.loraindivorceattorney.com
Car Accident Lawyers
Sunnyvale, CA Personal Injury Attorney
www.esrajunglaw.com
East Greenwich Family Law Attorney
Divorce Lawyer - Erica S. Janton
www.jantonfamilylaw.com/about
Los Angeles Police Misconduct
Civil Rights Lawyers
www.mcmurrayhenriks.com
Rosemead, CA
Real Estate Litigation Lawyer
www.kigrosslaw.com
  Law Firm Directory
 
 
 
© ClassActionTimes.com. All rights reserved.

The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Class Action Times as a service to the internet community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. Affordable Law Firm Web Design