Today's Date: Add To Favorites
ThyssenKrupp takes Mittal to court over Dofasco
World Business News | 2006/12/25 10:15

ThyssenKrupp AG of Germany has initiated summary legal proceedings against Mittal Steel Company N V. The proceedings were initiated in district court of Rotterdam on December 22 alleging Mittal Steel breached a January 26, 2006 letter of agreement between Mittal Steel and ThyssenKrupp with respect to sale of Dofasco Inc., the Canadian steelmaker to ThyssenKrupp.

ThyssenKrupp has alleged that Mittal Steel breached the letter of agreement by failing to cause Arcelor SA to initiate litigation against Strategic Steel Stichting, an independent Dutch Foundation which currently holds 89% of Dofasco’s shares, to force Stichting to transfer the Dofasco shares to Arcelor so as to permit their sale to ThyssenKrupp, a Mittal Steel statement issued from Rotterdam said..

The lawsuit seeks a court order directing Mittal Steel to cause Arcelor to commence summary proceedings in Dutch courts to force Stichting to return the Dofasco shares to Arcelor and impose a penalty of 500,000 euros per day for each day that Mittal Steel fails to do so.

The statement quotes Simon Evans, Mittal Steel’s general counsel as having said: “ThyssenKrupp’s suit is entirely without merit. Mittal Steel is very surprised and disappointed that ThyssenKrupp has initiated a lawsuit since Mittal Steel has taken all reasonable actions to comply with the letter of agreement and to obtain dissolution of Stichting. Moreover, ThyssenKrupp is well aware from ongoing discussions, neither Mittal Steel nor Arcelor has yet made a final decision regarding possible litigation against Stichting.”

“Mittal Steel is continuing to consider the possibility of litigation against Stichting with its Dutch legal advisors , although Mittal Steel has been advised that the prospects for success of such litigation are remote,” the Mittal Steel statement said.

Incidentally the January 26, 2006 letter of agreement between ThyssenKrupp and Mittal Steel had said that if Mittal Steel was successful in its tender offer for Arcelor and was able to exert management control “with ability to sell Dofasco,” Mittal Steel would cause Arcelor to sell Dofasco shares to ThyssenKrupp.

During March-April 2006, Arcelor acquired 100% of Dofasco shares. On April 3 Arcelor had transferred 89% of shares of Dofasco to Stichting and independent foundation under Dutch la, thereby removing Arcelor’s ability to sell or dispose of such shares without Stichting’s consent. On June 25, Mittal Steel and Arcelor agreed to terms of a recommended offer and later Mittal Steel acquired 94% of Arcelor stock.

On August 1, to resolve certain US competition concerns, Mittal Steel agreed to use its best efforts to sell Dofasco to ThyssenKrupp or, if Dofasco cannot be sold due to Stichting , to sell certain alternative assets.

Subsequently on September 25 and October 11 boards of Mittal Steel and Arcelor formally requested that the Stichting be dissolved and return Dofasco shares to Arcelor. On November 10, the Stichting board of directors unanimously decided not to dissolve and to retain the Dofasco shares, thereby continuing to prevent their sale.



[PREV] [1] ..[8052][8053][8054][8055][8056][8057][8058][8059][8060].. [8238] [NEXT]
All
Class Action
Bankruptcy
Biotech
Breaking Legal News
Business
Corporate Governance
Court Watch
Criminal Law
Health Care
Human Rights
Insurance
Intellectual Property
Labor & Employment
Law Center
Law Promo News
Legal Business
Legal Marketing
Litigation
Medical Malpractice
Mergers & Acquisitions
Political and Legal
Politics
Practice Focuses
Securities
Elite Lawyers
Tax
Featured Law Firms
Tort Reform
Venture Business News
World Business News
Law Firm News
Attorneys in the News
Events and Seminars
Environmental
Legal Careers News
Patent Law
Consumer Rights
International
Legal Spotlight
Current Cases
State Class Actions
Federal Class Actions
Starbucks appears likely to ..
Supreme Court will weigh ban..
Judge in Trump case orders m..
Court makes it easier to sue..
Top Europe rights court cond..
Elon Musk will be investigat..
Retired Supreme Court Justic..
The Man Charged in an Illino..
Texas’ migrant arrest law w..
Former Georgia insurance com..
Alabama woman who faked kidn..
A Supreme Court ruling in a ..
Court upholds mandatory pris..
Trump wants N.Y. hush money ..
Supreme Court restores Trump..


Class action or a representative action is a form of lawsuit in which a large group of people collectively bring a claim to court and/or in which a class of defendants is being sued. This form of collective lawsuit originated in the United States and is still predominantly a U.S. phenomenon, at least the U.S. variant of it. In the United States federal courts, class actions are governed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule. Since 1938, many states have adopted rules similar to the FRCP. However, some states like California have civil procedure systems which deviate significantly from the federal rules; the California Codes provide for four separate types of class actions. As a result, there are two separate treatises devoted solely to the complex topic of California class actions. Some states, such as Virginia, do not provide for any class actions, while others, such as New York, limit the types of claims that may be brought as class actions. They can construct your law firm a brand new website, lawyer website templates and help you redesign your existing law firm site to secure your place in the internet.
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
Lorain Elyria Divorce Lawyer
www.loraindivorceattorney.com
Legal Document Services in Los Angeles, CA
Best Legal Document Preparation
www.tllsg.com
Car Accident Lawyers
Sunnyvale, CA Personal Injury Attorney
www.esrajunglaw.com
East Greenwich Family Law Attorney
Divorce Lawyer - Erica S. Janton
www.jantonfamilylaw.com/about
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
Connecticut Special Education Lawyer
www.fortelawgroup.com
  Law Firm Directory
 
 
 
© ClassActionTimes.com. All rights reserved.

The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Class Action Times as a service to the internet community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. Affordable Law Firm Web Design