|
|
|
Court TV, R.I.P.
Legal Marketing |
2007/12/26 11:43
|
The network that burst into public consciousness with the O.J. Simpson trial and other big-name courtroom dramas in the 1990s becomes part of television history Tuesday, renamed truTV to emphasize its prime-time action programming. Besides the name, there won't be many immediate changes to what Court TV has become. The six remaining hours of legal-oriented material during the day will remain, labeled ''In Session.'' The Tuesday premiere of ''Ocean Force Huntington Beach O.C.'' typifies the network's direction. The series follows lifeguards on a busy California beach, emphasizing heart-pounding rescues rather than hours spent ogling hot bodies. That's about as far from swearing in a witness as you can get, but Court TV's viewers are used to the disconnect. Court TV prime-time has emphasized non-fiction series like the long-running ''Forensic Files'' and newer shows like ''The Real Hustle,'' which interviews pickpockets about tricks of the trade; the upcoming ''Black Gold,'' about oil prospectors; and ''Speeders,'' which shows tapes of people trying to talk their way out of speeding tickets. That's part of an intensely competitive television world; ''Black Gold'' taps into the same fascination with grueling jobs as ''Deadliest Catch'' on Discovery and ''Ice Road Truckers'' on The History Channel, for example. Now the network takes the risk of shedding an established brand for the unknown. ''It's a big concern,'' conceded Steve Koonin, president of Turner Entertainment Networks, which includes the soon-to-become truTV. ''Court TV is a very well-defined programming entity. Unfortunately, it's not as broad and doesn't offer the growth opportunities, we believe, as starting anew.'' Koonin oversaw the successful brandings of TNT and TBS. Those networks established clear identities -- TNT is for drama, TBS does comedy -- while keeping names that are essentially meaningless. TruTV's identity will be fast-moving programming that tells real stories about real people. There's such a glut of reality programming with a wide range of styles that truTV is making an explicit point of rejecting the term. TruTV isn't reality, its new slogan states. It's actuality. ''Reality has a connotation of not being real, of being phony,'' said Marc Juris, executive vice president and general manager of truTV. ''We felt that because [our programming] was real, we couldn't call it reality.'' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weston Hurd snaps up Beachwood law firm
Legal Marketing |
2007/12/23 01:50
|
Cleveland law firm Weston Hurd LLP has acquired Persky, Shapiro & Arnoff Co. L.P.A. of Beachwood for undisclosed terms.
Persky Shapiro employs seven attorneys, and the acquisition will bring Weston Hurd’s headcount to about 60 attorneys.
Weston Hurd managing partner Carolyn Cappel said the acquisition was attractive in part because it has added a tax practice group to her firm. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attorney becomes partner in law firm
Legal Marketing |
2007/12/19 01:17
|
Matthew P. Mastrogiacomo, has become a partner in the law firm of Isaacson & Raymond, 75 Park St. He joined the firm in 2001 as a litigator, and concentrates his practice in civil, criminal and landlord/tenant matters, as well as domestic and family law.
Mastrogiacomo is a graduate of the University of Maine at Machias and received his law degree from the University of Maine School of Law, cum laude, where he was named a prize arguer in the moot court program. He is a member of the family law and new lawyers sections of the Maine State Bar Association, Maine Trial Lawyers Association, and has been admitted to practice in the U.S. District Court. He is also vice chairman of the board of directors for Androscoggin County Head Start and Child Care, and a member of the Auburn-Lewiston Rotary Club. He lives in Lewiston with his wife. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attorney readies for class action lawsuit following fire
Legal Marketing |
2007/12/16 03:24
|
Latigo Canyon lawyer Jay Devitt has placed an advertisement in both local newspapers and is speaking to members of the community about putting together a class action lawsuit against the state and possibly other entities regarding alleged faults that led to last month's Corral Fire, which destroyed 53 homes and damaged another 33.
"We're going to sue anyone and everyone who is responsible, like a good attorney is supposed to do," Devitt said.
The main focus so far of the proposed litigation is the California Department of Parks and Recreation. Investigators say the fire started in or near a cave on State Parks land at the top of Corral Canyon known for late-night partying. Devitt said State Parks was negligible in not securing the area better.
"They had notice that this is a dangerous condition of public property with kids going up there," Devitt said.
A Corral Canyon resident who lost his home in the fire, Scott Palamar, had complained several times to State Parks officials about the partying, and the fire risk it created. He was not immediately available for comment for this story.
When asked why a private security guard was never hired by local homeowners to watch over the area, Devitt said it was not their job to do that.
Roy Stearns, spokesperson for State Parks, said he had heard nothing of the potential suit.
"We'll have to wait and see what it alleges, and go from there," Stearns said on Tuesday. "Our feeling is that with the shortage of rangers that we have, our people did all they could under the circumstances to address these issues."
Devitt said he would be hiring investigators to look into what else might have gone wrong during the fire. However, unlike what some Corral Canyon homeowners have alleged, Devitt said he did not see the city's reduction of the bottom of Corral Canyon Road to one lane as being a factor in the fire's outcome. Some homeowners said the reduction delayed the fire trucks.
Realtor Beverly Taki, who heads the Corral Canyon Safety Committee, said at a City Council meeting that the lane reduction hurt the fire response. She hinted at a possible lawsuit against the city in an interview last month with The Malibu Times. Taki said she is not involved with Devitt's lawsuit.
Devitt already has five homeowners who have joined the suit, but declined to mention their names. The attorney, who is the founder and former president of the Malibu Bar Association, only received minor smoke damage to his home. But he knows many people who suffered losses.
"My view of Latigo Canyon is completely black," he said. "Some of my neighbors did lose their homes."
Prior to any lawsuit, what is called a government claim must first be filed against the state about its alleged negligence. If the state fails to respond within 45 days, a lawsuit could be filed. The suit must be filed within six months after the fire.
"With more than 50 houses having burned down averaging a value of about $1.5 million, that's at least $75 million," Devitt said. "There is also emotional distress and some people had the inconvenience of having to pay hotel bills." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DNCC hires Denver law firm
Legal Marketing |
2007/12/14 02:45
|
Politically connected Denver law and lobbying firm Isaacson Rosenbaum has been chosen as outside counsel for the Democratic National Convention Committee (DNCC) as it prepares for next summer's event here. The firm and one of its top attorneys -- Mark Grueskin, a Democrat and onetime legal counsel and legislative aide to former Colorado Gov. Richard Lamm -- will help the committee navigate federal election rules and local laws, working with the DNCC's on-staff general counsel, Susana Carbajal. "We're kind of a legal defensive secondary," Grueskin said. "We'll watch and see how things develop, and we'll help tackle whatever legal issues require more staffing or a different kind of expertise." He said Isaacson Rosenbaum has identified 10 areas where the DNCC may need its help before and during the Aug. 25-28 convention, from contract negotiation and employment law to campaign finance rules "and just plain political advice." One of the firm's key roles will be to help the DNCC comply with Federal Election Commission (FEC) rules covering convention operations, Carbajal said. "Because we receive federal funds, we do have to spend those funds according to the FEC and their regulations," she said. It's customary for a party to hire a local law firm in the convention host city to help with on-site legal work. The assignment is considered a plum for the chosen firm -- and a sign of close ties between the firm and the party. "We're awfully proud [to be chosen]," Grueskin said. "It's gratifying that ... they hired us because there are so many different kinds of things that our law firm can do that they might need." Carbajal -- an attorney for the Austin, Texas, firm of Brown McCarroll and a former aide to President Bill Clinton -- was named DNCC general counsel in April. She said she recommended Isaacson Rosenbaum to her committee after interviewing several local attorneys and firms. She said she wanted a firm with solid experience in election-finance and public-policy law as well as with good relations with local leaders, and Isaacson Rosenbaum offered both strengths. "One of the main reasons we chose [the firm] is because of Mark Grueskin. ... He was a driving force in our selection," she said. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
America’s Best TV Legal Commentators
Legal Marketing |
2007/12/13 07:25
|
Joseph Klest of the Law Offices of Joseph Klest is featured in an exciting, exclusive, in-depth and inside interview, discussing
America’s Best TV Legal Commentators. Joseph is a highly accomplished attorney with over twenty-four years of experience representing clients in a variety of personal injury claims. He is an eloquent advocate and distinguished expert on some of the country’s most important legal matters. Joseph Klest has received an AV rating from Martindale-Hubbell, the national rating service for attorneys. In order to determine the appropriate rating for an attorney, Martindale-Hubbell performs extensive and confidential peer reviews of members of the attorney’s State bar. The AV rating is the highest possible rating. It identifies an attorney as having a very high to preeminent legal ability, and is a reflection of the attorney’s expertise, experience, integrity and overall professional excellence. The law offices of Joseph G. Klest, in Chicago and Schaumburg, Illinois, represents victims of serious personal injury throughout the Chicago metropolitan area and Illinois. Mr. Klest aggressively advocates for accident victims throughout Cook County, Will County, Lake County, and DuPage County. He handles most personal injury matters, including auto accident claims, birth injuries, and medical malpractice. You can contact Joseph at 847-969-9510, or email info@josephklest.com.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas Judge Sued Over Death Row Appeal
Legal Marketing |
2007/11/07 08:24
|
| An executed man's wife filed a lawsuit Wednesday alleging that a judge violated his rights by refusing to keep the state's highest criminal court open late so his lawyers could file an appeal the day he was set to die. Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Presiding Judge Sharon Keller refused to allow the court to stay open past 5 p.m. on Sept. 25 even though attorneys for Michael Richard had called and asked for extra time to file their appeal. "I would ask her why she just couldn't wait a few more minutes. It wouldn't have cost her anything to do this," 43-year-old Marsha Richard said. Keller declined to comment on the federal lawsuit, which also named "John Does" as defendants acting in their official capacities. Michael Richard's laywers later unsuccessfully appealed his case to the U.S. Supreme Court on grounds that the lethal injection was unconstitutionally cruel punishment. The high court turned down the appeal because the lower court had not heard his case, said Randall Kallinen, Marsha Richard's attorney. "Everybody is in agreement the appeal would have been successful if it had been allowed to be filed," he said. Before it turned down the appeal, the Supreme Court had decided to review the constitutionality of lethal injection in a Kentucky case. Richard so far has been the only person executed in the nation since the Supreme Court made its announcement about the Kentucky case. Keller is accused of violating an "open courts" provision of the Texas Constitution, causing Michael Richard's wrongful death and violating his Fourth Amendment right to protection against unlawful searches and seizures. The lawsuit is asking for an unspecified amount of punitive damages and seeks a court order to be issued directing Keller, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals' clerk and other court personnel not to stop emergency death penalty appeals from being filed. The 11th Amendment gives states immunity from federal lawsuits. But Kallinen said Keller is not immune to a lawsuit because her actions violated established statutory or constitutional rights. Michael Richard, 49, was executed for the 1986 murder of Marguerite Lucille Dixon. Evidence showed she was raped and fatally shot in her home by Richard, who then stole two televisions and a van from the house outside Houston. Richard insisted he wasn't responsible for the woman's death. Last month, a group of lawyers filed a complaint against Keller with the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, accusing her of improperly cutting off appeals that led to Richard's execution. On Tuesday, the criminal appeals court decided to allow emergency e-mail appeals in death penalty cases. "I hope nothing like this happens to anyone else," said Marsha Richard, who married her husband five years ago after meeting him while she visited her brother, who was also on death row. Meanwhile, in Florida, the state's highest court denied a stay of execution for Mark Dean Schwab, who was convicted of raping and murdering an 11-year-old 16 years ago. He is scheduled for execution Nov. 15. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class action or a representative action is a form of lawsuit in which a large group of people collectively bring a claim to court and/or in which a class of defendants is being sued. This form of collective lawsuit originated in the United States and is still predominantly a U.S. phenomenon, at least the U.S. variant of it. In the United States federal courts, class actions are governed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule. Since 1938, many states have adopted rules similar to the FRCP. However, some states like California have civil procedure systems which deviate significantly from the federal rules; the California Codes provide for four separate types of class actions. As a result, there are two separate treatises devoted solely to the complex topic of California class actions. Some states, such as Virginia, do not provide for any class actions, while others, such as New York, limit the types of claims that may be brought as class actions. They can construct your law firm a brand new website and help you redesign your existing law firm site to secure your place in the internet. |
Law Firm Directory
|
|