|
|
|
Nixon Peabody Names First Sustainability Officer
Environmental |
2007/11/14 14:00
|
The Legal Newswire - International law firm Nixon Peabody LLP announces the appointment of a Chief Sustainability Officer. Carolyn S. Kaplan, an attorney in the firm’s energy and environmental practice, will serve in the new role. Nixon Peabody is the first in the legal industry to establish such a position, although many of the firm’s clients and global industries have done so as part of corporate commitments to sustainability.
Ms. Kaplan has almost two decades of experience with environmental protection and renewable energy projects. She counsels her clients on an array of issues that impact development projects and facilities, including environmental impact review, wetlands, tidelands licensing, storm water, water supply, land use, and hazardous waste site assessment and remediation. Ms. Kaplan co-chairs the firm’s Renewable Energy Team and has assisted clients on a variety of renewable energy projects, including the siting of land-based and offshore wind facilities. In her role as Chief Sustainability Officer, she will work closely with Nixon Peabody’s operations director to further reduce the firm’s carbon footprint and implement internal green initiatives, as well as to look for opportunities to partner with clients and potential clients on joint sustainability activities. The firm hopes that all of its personnel will become involved to identify innovative ways to improve the sustainability of its own activities and to advise clients in this rapidly growing sector. While serving as Chief Sustainability Officer, Ms. Kaplan will continue her legal practice in energy, environmental and land use law.
“This new position reflects our commitment to implement sustainable principles at every opportunity in our firm. We are supporting the commitment to sustainable practices that our clients are adopting and implementing,” said Harry P. Trueheart III, Chairman and Managing Partner of Nixon Peabody. “Although many law firms have separate practices that occasionally serve sustainable clients needs, at Nixon Peabody, we combine our legal experience, thought leadership, and good citizenship to serve our clients as very few other law firms can. With Carolyn serving as Chief Sustainability Officer, we intend to take our firm wide green initiative to the next level.”
For years, Nixon Peabody has been taking important steps towards sustainable business practices. Earlier this year, the firm announced the opening of its first green office in San Francisco which is a model of sustainable design, green building techniques, and a healthy work environment. The office has been certified by the United States Green Building Council under the program for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) making Nixon Peabody the first law firm in the U.S. to be LEED-certified in the category of "Commercial Interiors." The category includes all pre-existing office buildings and commercial space. In the coming months, other Nixon Peabody offices will also pursue LEED-certification. By establishing this position, the firm can achieve even greater progress. For example, all of the firm’s offices are implementing sustainability programs, adopting waste minimization practices, switching to eco-friendly building materials and cleaning products, and identifying other ways to reduce the firm’s carbon footprint.
“I’m proud to serve in this new role at Nixon Peabody,” said Ms. Kaplan. “In addition to improving our own performance, I believe we can assist our clients to achieve their business goals while attaining the best environmental result. I will be working with our attorneys and staff to identify sustainability efforts already underway within the firm, and to help develop plans to drive these efforts forward firm wide.”
Ms. Kaplan is an active member of the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA), serving on AWEA’s Siting Committee and Offshore Wind Working Group. She is active in the New England Environmental Business Council (EBC) and served as a co-chair of the EBC’s public policy committee. Ms. Kaplan has moderated and served on numerous panels involving renewable energy topics and she has published several articles on wind energy. She co-authors the renewable energy section of the biannual report for the American Bar Association’s section of Public Utility, Communications and Transportation Law (PUCAT). Ms. Kaplan received her J.D., cum laude, from Boston College Law School and she earned her B.A. from Cornell University.
About Nixon Peabody
Nixon Peabody LLP is one of the largest law firms in the United States and is recognized by American Lawyer Media as a "Global 100" firm. With 700 attorneys collaborating across 25 major practice areas in 17 office locations, including Boston, Chicago, London, Los Angeles, New York City, Rochester, San Francisco, Silicon Valley, and Washington, DC, the firm’s size, diversity, and advanced technological resources enable it to offer comprehensive legal services to individuals and organizations of all sizes in local, state, national, and international matters. Nixon Peabody has been recognized by FORTUNE magazine as one of its “100 Best Companies To Work For®” in 2007 for the second consecutive year. The firm has also been named to the Human Rights Campaign’s 2007 “Best Places To Work For GLBT Equality” list. |
|
|
|
|
|
Peterson & Associates Advises Defibrilator Users
Class Action |
2007/11/14 12:20
|
Kansas City basedlaw firm, Peterson & Associates, P.C. (www.petersonlawfirm.com), is advising of recent news indicating the critical effects and possible death to those whom have a Medtronic Sprint Fidelis Defibrillator with faulty leads. The FDA issued a class I recall of Medtronic Sprint Fidelis Defibrillator leads because fractures have been detected in some leads. Models 6930, 6931, 6948 and 6949 are currently among the recall.
Reports have indicated that if a defibrillator lead breaks it may deliver unnecessary shocks or may fail to operate at all, which could result in death.
To determine if you have a defective lead, first research your card that identifies the model number of your defibrillator lead. Also, you can call your doctor who implanted your defibrillator and ask what types of leads were used with your defibrillator. Or, you may receive a letter from Medtronic.
If you believe you or someone you know has been a potential defibrillator lead, schedule a medical examination immediately. If you are amongst this recall you may be entitled to recover monetary compensation. All legal claims are subject to time limits so don't delay. A delay in filing a claim may result in the forfeiture and right you may have to compensation.
Peterson & Associates, P.C. is a leading products liability and personal injury law firm that has collected over $300 million in settlements and judgments for its clients. Headquartered in Kansas City, Missouri on the Country Club Plaza, Peterson & Associates, P.C., represents clients nationwide. Under the guidance of the firm's
president, David M. Peterson, Peterson & Associates, P.C. has collected compensation for thousands of clients who have suffered injuries from using dangerous medications and medical devices. The Firm is currently evaluating claims for clients injured by many dangerous pharmaceuticals and medical devices, such as users of the birth control patch Ortho Evra who suffered a heart attack, stroke, deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism, individuals who developed adverse reactions from either Ketek or Tequin, people developing Stevens Johnson Syndrome (SJS) or Primary Pulmonary Hypertension (PPH), those who suffered a heart attack while on Avandia, individuals who received recalled implantable cardiac devices manufactured by Guidant, Medtronic and St. Jude, as well as individuals exposed to Benzene who developed leukemia or Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma, to name a few.
The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. |
|
|
|
|
|
Pedley Zielke Gordinier & Pence is Dissolving
Law Firm News |
2007/11/14 10:48
|
The Louisville law firm of Pedley Zielke Gordinier & Pence is dissolving at the end of the year.
David Pedley, a partner and one of 17 attorneys with the firm, said he and some other staffers will move from their current location in the Meidinger Tower to a new office in the Starks Building. They will create a new firm called Pedley & Gordinier.
Pedley said some other attorneys will stay in the Meidinger Tower and form another full-service legal business called Zielke Law Firm. The split was amicable, Pedley said, and will allow both groups to focus on their own respective growth strategies. |
|
|
|
|
|
Fulwider Patton LLP #1 in Trademark Gains
Intellectual Property |
2007/11/14 10:46
|
Fulwider Patton LLP, one of the oldest and most respected independent intellectual property law firms in Southern California, made the most dramatic gains in U.S. trademark filings during the Second Quarter of 2007 according to The Trademark Insider®. In its recently published Second Quarter 2007 edition, The Trademark Insider® reports that between April-June 2007, Fulwider Patton filed 118 federal trademark and service mark applications, and was ranked as being in the top 50 law firms nationwide in U.S. trademark filings for that period.
Reflecting on The Trademark Insider report, Fulwider Patton partner Jim Paul commented: "We are very pleased to receive this recognition. It underscores our firm's goal of offering quality representation at reasonable prices. Our excellent team of trademark attorneys works very closely with our clients to uncover and enhance the value of their intellectual property assets."
Fulwider Patton LLP is a full service intellectual property law firm serving clients in all areas of intellectual property including patents, trademarks, copyrights, Internet domain name disputes, trade secrets and unfair competition. With offices in Los Angeles and Long Beach, California, Fulwider Patton LLP represents clients throughout California and the United States, Europe and the Pacific Rim. |
|
|
|
|
|
South African Law Firms Merge to be Biggest
Law Firm News |
2007/11/14 08:50
|
COMMERCIAL law firms Webber Wentzel Bowens and Mallinicks yesterday announced plans to merge in a move that would make the new entity one of SA’s biggest law firms, and rival corporate law advisers Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs.
The new firm, which will be led by Webber Wentzel Bowens senior partner David Lancaster, will have 300 lawyers.
The Ernst & Young Mergers & Acquisitions Review for 2006, which ranks legal advisers on the value of transactions they advised on, ranked Webber Wentzel Bowens as second last year with 29 deals worth R52bn, followed by Edward Nathan with 35 deals worth R46,75bn. Mallinicks was ranked 36th with three deals worth R178m.
Combined, the firms could be a large player in the market and their merger is part of the recent trend which has seen consolidation in the legal services sector.
The merger follows that of Edward Nathan’s recent blockbuster merger with Cape Town based-law firm Sonnenberg Hoffmann Galombik. Prior to that, Cliffe Dekker entered into an alliance with the world’s second-biggest law firm , DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary.
Law experts say that the South African legal profession is a marketplace that is undergoing dramatic change. Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs chairman Michael Katz said mergers for large law firms “make good commercial sense. Nowadays law firms require scale.” Law firms must either scale up or become niche practices, he said. “Somewhere in between is problematic.”
However, Werksmans chairman Des Williams said relationships were more important at this stage than size for South African law firms to be world class.
Webber Wentzel Bowens had been looking for a merger partner for some time. “We have been focused on growth for some time now and we believe the new firm will allow us to enhance our delivery service to clients by capitalising on the enhanced quality, scale and scope of the merged firm to the advantage of our clients and staff,” Lancaster said.
The combined firm would start operating from March 1 next year . The merger would take effect when regulatory approvals were granted.
Mallinicks chairman Michael Evans said: “Webber Wentzel Bowens is the major force in corporate law in SA and merging with them will undoubtedly result in a strong, strategic and regional fit as a large part of our business is in corporate law too.”
“We will run the new merged entity as one firm. The new name and branding will underscore this fact,” Lancaster said.
Evans said both firms were committed to transformation. Between them they would have more than 100 black lawyers, of which 30 would be partners. |
|
|
|
|
|
Supreme Court takes no action in handgun ban case
Breaking Legal News |
2007/11/13 08:18
|
Both sides in a closely watched legal battle over the District of Columbia's strict gun-control law are urging the Supreme Court to hear the case. If the justices agree — a step they may announce as early as Tuesday — the Roberts court is likely to find itself back on the front lines of the culture wars with an intensity unmatched even by the cases on abortion and race that defined the court's last term. The question is whether the Second Amendment to the Constitution protects an individual right to "keep and bear arms." If the answer is yes, as the federal appeals court held in March, the justices must then decide what such an interpretation means for a statute that bars all possession of handguns and that requires any other guns in the home to be disassembled or secured by trigger locks. The Supreme Court has never answered the Second Amendment question directly, and it has been nearly 70 years since the court even approached it obliquely. A decision in 1939, United States v. Miller, held that a sawed-off shotgun was not one of the "arms" to which the Second Amendment referred in its single, densely written, and oddly punctuated sentence: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Asked during his confirmation hearing what he thought that sentence meant, Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. responded that the Miller decision had "side-stepped the issue" and had left "very open" the question of whether the Second Amendment protects an individual right as opposed to a collective right. A three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, on which the chief justice formerly sat, ruled in March by a vote of 2 to 1 that "the right in question is individual," not tied to membership in a state militia. On that basis, the court declared that the 31-year-old statute, one of the country's strictest, was unconstitutional. |
|
|
|
|
|
Gibson Dunn Promotes 14 Lawyers to Partner
Law Firm News |
2007/11/13 07:23
|

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP is pleased to announce that the Firm has elected 14 new partners, effective January 1, 2008. The new partners represent a wide range of practice areas and geographical regions.
"We are proud to recognize the accomplishments of this extraordinarily talented group of attorneys," said Ken Doran, Managing Partner of Gibson Dunn. "The new partners are exceptional lawyers, who reflect our firm's values of excellence, personal integrity, collegiality and dedication to providing the highest level of service to our clients. Representing diverse practices across our offices, they bring a wealth of knowledge, experience and expertise that will be a tremendous resource for our clients and our firm."
The new partners include:
-- Dora R. Arash -- Arash's practice focuses on federal income tax
planning for corporations and partnerships, as well as tax controversy
matters. Resident in the Los Angeles office, she graduated magna cum
laude from the Pepperdine University School of Law in 1994.
-- Ron C. Ben-Yehuda -- Ben-Yehuda practices in the areas of transactional
intellectual property, media and technology, focusing extensively on
agreements relating to technology development, marketing and licensing,
as well as e-commerce and other online activities. Prior to joining
the Firm, he was general counsel of a public software company.
Resident in the Los Angeles office, he graduated with distinction from
Stanford Law School in 1987. -- Anne Lee Benedict -- Benedict's practice focuses on corporate finance,
business combination, securities and general corporate matters.
Resident in the Washington, D.C. office, she graduated from the
University of Pennsylvania Law School in 1999. -- Frederick S. Chung -- Chung practices intellectual property litigation,
focusing on patent litigation. Resident in the Palo Alto office, he
graduated cum laude from Harvard Law School in 1995. Following his
graduation from law school, he served as a law clerk to the Honorable
Karen Nelson Moore of the U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, in
Cleveland, Ohio. -- Rachel Couter -- An English-qualified lawyer, Couter practices
international litigation, arbitration and other dispute resolution,
including contentious regulatory disputes. She is a Solicitor of the
Supreme Court of England and Wales. Resident in the London office, she
obtained a first class honors degree in law from the University of
Cambridge in 1994. -- Michael M. Farhang -- Farhang practices white collar criminal,
securities, and general business litigation. Prior to joining the
Firm, he served as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Central
District of California, where he specialized in white collar fraud
prosecutions in the Major Fraud section. Farhang also participated in
legal assignments in Iraq for the Department of Justice in 2003.
Resident in the Los Angeles office, he received his law degree cum
laude from Harvard Law School in 1995. -- Drew C. Flowers -- Flowers focuses his practice on real estate
transactions, with a particular emphasis on representing capital
partners, developers and lenders in complex financing transactions.
Resident in the Los Angeles office, he received his law degree from the
University of Southern California in 1998. -- Eduardo Gallardo -- Gallardo concentrates his practice on mergers and
acquisitions and general corporate transactions. Resident in the New
York office, he graduated from Columbia Law School in 1999, where he
was a Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar. -- Joshua Lipton -- Lipton is a member of the Firm's Antitrust Practice
Group. His practice includes antitrust litigation, merger and
acquisition investigations, antitrust counseling, and antitrust
investigations by federal and state agencies and the European
Commission. Resident in the Washington, D.C. office, he received his
law degree magna cum laude from the University of Michigan School of
Law in 1998, where he graduated first in his class. -- Michael K. Murphy -- Murphy's practice focuses on environmental
litigation and counseling. He also has experience handling various
government contract-related issues. Resident in the Washington, D.C.
office, he graduated from the University of Virginia School of Law in
1999. -- Julian W. Poon -- Poon is an appellate and general commercial
litigator, with a broad range of experience at both the appellate and
trial court level across the country in antitrust, intellectual
property, class action, labor, energy, media-access, and general
commercial litigation. Prior to joining the Firm, he served as a law
clerk to Justice Antonin Scalia of the Supreme Court of the United
States during the 2000-2001 Term, and to Judge J. Michael Luttig of the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1999-2000. Resident
in the Los Angeles office, he graduated summa cum laude from Harvard
Law School in 1999, receiving the Fay Diploma for placing first in his
class. -- C. William Thomas, Jr. -- Thomas's practice emphasizes the formation
and operation of domestic and international private investment funds,
including hedge funds, private equity funds, real estate funds and
funds of funds. Resident in the Washington, D.C. office, he received
his law degree magna cum laude from Harvard University in 1998. -- Michael L. Reed -- Reed's practice involves corporate securities,
merger and acquisition, corporate finance, and general business and
contract matters. Resident in the San Francisco office, he received
his law degree from the University of California, Los Angeles in 1994. -- Aric H. Wu -- Wu practices complex commercial litigation with a
significant concentration in the area of securities litigation.
Resident in the New York office, he received his law degree, with
distinction as a Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar, from Columbia University
School of Law in 1998.
|
|
|
|
|
Class action or a representative action is a form of lawsuit in which a large group of people collectively bring a claim to court and/or in which a class of defendants is being sued. This form of collective lawsuit originated in the United States and is still predominantly a U.S. phenomenon, at least the U.S. variant of it. In the United States federal courts, class actions are governed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule. Since 1938, many states have adopted rules similar to the FRCP. However, some states like California have civil procedure systems which deviate significantly from the federal rules; the California Codes provide for four separate types of class actions. As a result, there are two separate treatises devoted solely to the complex topic of California class actions. Some states, such as Virginia, do not provide for any class actions, while others, such as New York, limit the types of claims that may be brought as class actions. They can construct your law firm a brand new website, lawyer website templates and help you redesign your existing law firm site to secure your place in the internet. |
Law Firm Directory
|
|