|
|
|
Writers' Strike Nearing A Resolution
Labor & Employment |
2008/02/10 12:34
|
Hollywood writers were optimistic they could end a three-month strike that has crippled the entertainment industry after reviewing a proposed deal from studios that increases their payments for online use of TV shows and movies. Leaders of the Writers Guild of America recommended the deal Saturday to thousands of members gathered on both coasts and warned that holding out for a better deal might be disastrous. Union chief negotiator John Bowman told writers at the Shrine Auditorium in Los Angeles that "if they push any further, everyone would fall off the cliff," said Mike Rowe, a writer for the animated show "Futurama." The WGA board planned to meet Sunday and decide whether to authorize a membership vote to lift the strike, according to a person familiar with the plan who requested anonymity because of a media blackout. If guild members approve, they could be back at work on Wednesday, although formal approval of a contract would have to await ratification by members, which could take two weeks. Giving writers a 48-hour window to vote on lifting the strike order would help alleviate concerns that the agreement was being pushed too rapidly by the guild's board. Still, writers seemed confident that the walkout, which cost the Los Angeles area economy alone an estimated $1 billion or more, was coming to a close. "It's a historic moment for labor in this country," said Oscar-nominated WGA member Michael Moore, who attended the New York meeting. Carmen Culver, a film and TV writer, lauded the guild "for hanging tough." "It's a great day for the labor movement. We have suffered a lot of privation in order to achieve what we've achieved," Culver said. The WGA's first strike in 20 years began Nov. 5 and involved 10,000 members. It idled thousands of other entertainment industry workers, from caterers to security staff, disrupted both TV and movie production and derailed the Golden Globes awards, which was reduced to a news conference because actors wouldn't cross picket lines. The Grammy Awards, set for Sunday night, were not affected because they received a waiver allowing writers to work on them. But an end to the strike could permit resumption of work for the Feb. 24 Academy Awards show. A tentative three-year agreement was hammered out in recent talks between the WGA and the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, with the actual contract language concluded by lawyers on Friday. According to the guild's summary, the deal provides union jurisdiction over projects created for the Internet based on certain guidelines, sets compensation for streamed, ad-supported programs and increases residuals for downloaded movies and TV programs. |
|
|
|
|
|
Venezuela threatens U.S. over Exxon fight
International |
2008/02/10 10:36
|
President Hugo Chavez on Sunday threatened to cut off oil sales to the United States in an "economic war" if Exxon Mobil Corp. wins court judgments to seize billions of dollars in Venezuelan assets. Exxon Mobil has gone after the assets of state oil company Petroleos de Venezuela SA in U.S., British and Dutch courts as it challenges the nationalization of a multibillion dollar oil project by Chavez's government. A British court has issued an injunction "freezing" as much as $12 billion in assets. "If you end up freezing (Venezuelan assets) and it harms us, we're going to harm you," Chavez said during his weekly radio and television program, "Hello, President." "Do you know how? We aren't going to send oil to the United States. Take note, Mr. Bush, Mr. Danger." Chavez has repeatedly threatened to cut off oil shipments to the United States, which is Venezuela's No. 1 client, if Washington tries to oust him. Chavez's warnings on Sunday appeared to extend that threat to attempts by oil companies to challenge his government's nationalization drive through lawsuits. "I speak to the U.S. empire, because that's the master: continue and you will see that we won't sent one drop of oil to the empire of the United States," Chavez said Sunday. "The outlaws of Exxon Mobil will never again rob us," Chavez said, accusing the Irving, Texas-based oil company of acting in concert with Washington. A U.S. Embassy spokeswoman did not immediately return a call seeking comment. Venezuelan Oil Minister Rafael Ramirez has argued that court orders won by Exxon Mobil have "no effect" on the state oil company PDVSA and are merely "transitory measures" while Venezuela presents its case in courts in New York and London. Exxon Mobil is also taking its claims to international arbitration, disputing the terms it was granted under Chavez's nationalization last year of four heavy oil projects in the Orinoco River basin, one of the world's richest oil deposits. Other major oil companies including U.S.-based Chevron Corp., France's Total, Britain's BP PLC, and Norway's StatoilHydro ASA have negotiated deals with Venezuela to continue on as minority partners in the Orinoco oil project. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jackson Law Firm Helps Build Habitat House
Legal Marketing |
2008/02/09 14:44
|
The Watkins, Ludlam, Winter and Stennis law firm teamed up with its adopted school, Power APAC, to build this house on Hunt Street. They'll work every Saturday for the next two months to complete the home. Today they framed up the wall partitions and started on the roof. Excited future homeowner Kenyetta Prater says she appreciates the efforts of habitat volunteers. She can't wait to move in with her two children. Prater says "I currently work at the Blair E. Batson Hospital in surgery. I'm a surgical tech. I'm currently living in an apartment and my dream is to own a home." Ms. Prater and her family will help build the home. Then she will pay for it through an affordable mortgage loan. Habitat houses are built through donations of money and materials. |
|
|
|
|
|
Egypt Court Upholds Christian Conversion
International |
2008/02/09 14:38
|
Egypt's highest civil court ruled Saturday that 12 Coptic Christians who had converted to Islam could return to their old faith, ending a yearlong legal battle over the predominantly Muslim state's tolerance for conversion. The court overturned an April 2007 ruling by a lower court that forbade the 12 Muslims from returning to Christianity on the grounds that Islamic law would consider that apostasy. There is no Egyptian law against converting from Islam to Christianity, but in this case tradition had taken precedent. Under a widespread interpretation of Islamic law, converting from Islam is apostasy and punishable by death — though the state has never ordered or carried out an execution on those grounds. Judge Mohammed el-Husseini sidestepped the issue by saying the 12 should not be considered apostates since they were born Christian, said a judicial official on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the media. The judge also ordered the Ministry of Interior to list converts' former and current religious status on identification cards, which the government body had previously refused to do. |
|
|
|
|
|
Lawmakers urge high court to side with gun owners
Breaking Legal News |
2008/02/09 14:38
|
Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, who might start a run for Texas governor next year, has mustered support from a majority of Senate and House members to help persuade the Supreme Court to strike down the District of Columbia's gun laws. Hutchison said Thursday she is filing a friend-of-the-court brief in a challenge to the laws. Fifty-five senators and 250 House members have signed the brief to be filed Thursday by her and Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont. Hutchison has long opposed the district's ban on handguns and requirement that rifles and shotguns be registered, stored unloaded and either locked or disassembled. She has sponsored legislation several times to overturn the district's laws. Her 2004 bill passed the House, but not the Senate. The district's law forced her to dismantle and return to Texas her .357 Magnum she brought with her when she moved from Austin. "In Texas, of course, the right to keep and bear arms is well-settled. In fact, when in Texas you talk about gun control, they mean using two hands," Hutchison quipped in a speech organized by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. A federal appeals court ruled in March that the district's ban is an unconstitutional infringement on an individual's right to keep and bear arms. The district appealed the ruling to the Supreme Court, arguing the Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms only in the context of an organized militia. Hutchison argues it is an individual right. The court is expected to hear arguments next month. "All of the congressional legislative history is assuming that the Second Amendment, which is in the Bill of Rights, is an individual right and for a city or state to thwart this by taking a person's right in their home to have a loaded gun, just seemed to be a perfect opportunity for the Supreme Court to affirm this individual right that Congress has acknowledged throughout its history," Hutchison said. Tester said the writers of the Constitution did not intend for laws to be applied to some people and not others or to be applied some times and not others. "We cannot restrict the right to bear arms just like we can't restrict the right to practice religion or the right of a free and independent press," Tester said. Eleanor Holmes Norton, the congressional delegate for Washington, D.C., said Hutchison's brief is an attempt to get done in the courts what she couldn't get done in Congress. Norton and others have filed friend-of-the court briefs in support of the law. Norton said the rules have been supported by all four mayors the district has had since it got home rule and has not been opposed by any City Council members. "This is entirely a home rule, self-government matter. That is not anybody's business but our own," Norton said. Hutchison said she's willing to accept some restrictions on the Second Amendment, in the same way the right to free speech does not allow a person to yell "Fire!" in a crowded movie house. She said she hopes the case will similarly set a standard for how far the district can go in restricting guns without infringing on a person's right to defend themselves in their home. ___ |
|
|
|
|
|
Sprint Nextel hit with class action
Class Action |
2008/02/08 08:59
|
Sprint Nextel Corp. has been hit with a class action lawsuit alleging the No. 3 mobile phone carrier is defrauding wireless consumers. The lawsuit was filed in Illinois federal court.
“Defendants have misled and deceived consumers by extending consumers’ contracts for up to two years without providing adequate notice or obtaining in the 23-page complaint. "We're still reviewing the complaint, so we can't comment on the specific claims it contains," said a Sprint Nextel spokesman. "We take great care to ensure that our customers understand the terms of their contracts for service with our company."
On a related front, Alltel Corp. continues to be bogged down in a long-running, wireless consumer class-action lawsuit in Arkansas federal court.
The plaintiffs assert, among other things, that Alltel fails to disclose applicable fees and charges, billing and sales practices and service limitations.
Alltel, acquired last year by private equity firms TPG Capital and GS Capital Partners in a $27.5 billion deal, is currently fighting to prevent the case from returning to state court. Alltel said the suit belongs in federal court because of a 1993 law that preempts state regulation of wireless rates while reserving to states jurisdiction of “other terms and conditions” of wireless service.
meaningful consent to a contract extension when consumers made small changes to their telephone service, such as adding extra minutes or purchasing a new telephone; when they responded to solicitations by defendants for additional products and services; and when the consumer received ‘courtesy discounts’,” stated plaintiffs |
|
|
|
|
|
US Congress backs stimulus for troubled economy
Politics |
2008/02/08 08:19
|
The US Congress has overwhelmingly approved a giant economic stimulus plan sought by the White House amid mounting fears that the world's biggest economy could be sliding into a recession. Senate and House of Representative lawmakers approved the economic aid package in separate votes, clearing the way for it to be signed into law by President George W. Bush. "The president will sign it next week," White House spokeswoman Cynthia Bergman told AFP. She said an exact date had not yet been announced. Bush has hailed the package amid a worsening housing market downturn and a dramatic slowdown in American economic growth. The stressed economy lost jobs last month for the first time in over four years and a Wall Street credit crunch, triggered in part by rising home foreclosures, has roiled global financial markets in recent months. "This plan is robust, broad-based, timely, and it will be effective. This bill will help to stimulate consumer spending and accelerate needed business investment," Bush said in a statement released Thursday by the White House. The plan is valued at around 150 billion dollars and crammed with temporary tax rebates and business incentives. Tens of millions of Americans are likely to receive tax rebate checks in their mailboxes in coming months after Bush gives the stimulus his official blessing. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson also welcomed congressional approval of the package, saying it would inject money into a stressed economy. "This package of payments to individuals and incentives for businesses to invest will support our economy as we weather the housing downturn," the Treasury secretary said. Democratic and Republican senators had sparred over different incentives after the House of Representatives passed an initial version of the plan last Tuesday. The Democratic-controlled Senate approved an amended version of the House measure Thursday which senators changed to include tax rebates for low-income retirees and military veterans. House lawmakers met in an evening session to quickly approve the final amended package. The plan calls for tax rebate checks of up to 600 dollars for individual taxpayers and up to 1,200 dollars for couples, plus additional cash for dependent children. It also expands financing opportunities in the housing market by allowing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, two mortgage finance companies, to purchase or guarantee mortgages larger than 417,000 dollars up to 729,750 dollars. Lawmakers said it will not benefit wealthy Americans, as tax relief begins to phase out for individuals earning 75,000 dollars and for married couples with a combined income above 150,000 dollars. It will, however, provide "unprecedented" help to some 35 million families who work but make too little to pay taxes, they said. People who earned at least 3,000 dollars in 2007 are eligible for 300 dollars per individual or 600 dollars per couple, lawmakers said. Democrats and lawmakers from Bush's Republican Party applauded the plan. "Today's agreement is a victory for a better, more effective economic stimulus. Economists agree that consumer spending, fueled by tax rebates, can boost America's economy," said Democratic Senator Max Baucus. Republican Senator Mitch McConnell said:"This is not a victory for Republicans or Democrats. This is a victory for the American people." It's unclear, however, how much of a boost the vast package will give the troubled economy. Some economists have voiced doubt about whether the plan will deliver a needed shot-in-the-arm to growth. Its success will depend in part upon whether Americans spend their rebate checks and boost consumer spending or stuff them in bank accounts. Political concern about the economy has increased amid worries the country is on the cusp of a recession. The Federal Reserve has slashed interest rates since September in a bid to fire up economic momentum, which slowed significantly to a 0.6 percent annualized crawl during the fourth quarter of last year. Paulson said the government could start mailing out tax rebates to those eligible to receive them by early May. |
|
|
|
|
Class action or a representative action is a form of lawsuit in which a large group of people collectively bring a claim to court and/or in which a class of defendants is being sued. This form of collective lawsuit originated in the United States and is still predominantly a U.S. phenomenon, at least the U.S. variant of it. In the United States federal courts, class actions are governed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule. Since 1938, many states have adopted rules similar to the FRCP. However, some states like California have civil procedure systems which deviate significantly from the federal rules; the California Codes provide for four separate types of class actions. As a result, there are two separate treatises devoted solely to the complex topic of California class actions. Some states, such as Virginia, do not provide for any class actions, while others, such as New York, limit the types of claims that may be brought as class actions. They can construct your law firm a brand new website, lawyer website templates and help you redesign your existing law firm site to secure your place in the internet. |
Law Firm Directory
|
|